Following World War I, “armed opposition to European
occupation emerged immediately in Syria” according to Michael Provence’s The
Great Syrian Revolt and the Rise of Arab Nationalism. For example,
“thousands of Syrian men and women, some armed with no more than sticks, went
to stop” advancing French imperialist troops “at the pass of Khan Maysalun…25
kilometers west of Damascus…,” according to the same book; and “the Alawite
territory” of Syria “was in open revolt against the French between 1919 and
1921,” according to Philip Khoury’s Syria and the French Mandate. As the
same book also recalled:
“Yusaf al-‘Azma,…Emir Faisal’s Minister of War, led…a large
group of irregulars from the popular quarter of Damascus against the French
invasion…on July 24 [1920], at Khan Maysalun…On the following day the French
Army occupied Damascus…Approximately 150 Arabs were killed and another 1,500
were wounded at Maysalun…The French claim to have lost 42 men, with another 152
wounded and 14 missing. The size of the Arab forces have been estimated at
anywhere from 4,000 troops (including volunteers) to one division. The French
invasionary force was composed mainly of Algerians and Senegalese…Among the
dead at Maysalun lay [Syrian] General ‘Azma. Only 36 years old, he was
henceforth immortalized by Syrians as the supreme national martyr…
“…French columns penetrating from the northwest, had
occupied Aleppo two days before Damascus fell…French planes circled Aleppo,
dropping leaflets carrying [French General] Gouraud’s proclamation that local
residents must submit to French occupation…On July, 23 [1920], the French army
occupied Aleppo and by the 25th as many as 18,000 French troops were
stationed in and around the city. Meanwhile, 9,000 troops under the command of [French]
General Goybet took control of Damascus and the vicinity…
“…Two regions provided sustained resistance to pacification:
the Alawite [Syrian religious minority group] mountain and the northwestern
districts…Following s series of unsuccessful raids on French posts in the
winter and early spring of 1921, the French columns encircled the Alawite
mountains…Engagements over the next two months gave France the military edge,
although not without heavy casualties…The Alawite rebels surrendered…”
Syria and the French Mandate also described the economic and
political motivation for the French imperialist government’s decision to
militarily occupy Syria in
1920 and block political independence for people in Syria at that time, in the
following way:
“…In 1920, France still had the largest financial interests
in Syria, with the preponderance of her capital concentrated in the banking,
public utilities and transportation sectors, and in silk and tobacco
products…In addition to her consolidated prewar interests, France had
additional motives for occupying Syria which surfaced after 1914. These
included…new economic prospects in petroleum and cotton development…The
development of several harbors on the Syrian coast as terminals for oil
pipelines from northern Iraq, as commercial outlets for Aleppo and central
Syria, and for overland trade from Iraq and Iran would round out her overall
Mediterranean policy.
“…To French policy-makers, Arab nationalism…threatened not
only French financial…investments along the Syrian coast and in…Lebanon , but,
more importantly, French North Africa. To check the spread of nationalism, France had to establish hegemony over Damascus …There were French
financial and commercial interests, both established and potential. Of Syrian
raw materials, silk and cotton were of most interest to the French economy in
1920…French capitalists touted northern Syria as a potential French cotton
plantation…”
According to the same book, “one of the new” French
“colonial government’s first acts was to divide” Greater Syria “into a series
of regional units, based on sectarian differences, and the perceived interests
of France;” and “the coastal region of `Greater Syria,’ the area of greatest
traditional French influence, became the state of Greater Lebanon, intended to
maintain a…nominally Catholic majority.” As Syrian and the French Mandate recalled:
“…At the end of August 1920, the French decreed the new
state of Lebanon…Most of Lebanon’s newly acquired `citizens’ did not want to be
part of a Maronite [Catholic]-dominated Lebanon and agitated for union with the
rest of Syria…The creation of Greater Lebanon did more than pass the reins of
government to a minority ruling group; it also perpetuated Maronite dependency
on French support to remain in power…France’s favoritism toward Greater Lebanon
exacerbated the anti-French sentiments of the Syrian nationalist movement…”
(end of part 4)
No comments:
Post a Comment