Monday, September 22, 2014

The Movement To Democratize Egypt: A People's History of Egypt--Part 16: 1953-1954 Period

(This article first appeared in The Rag Blog on February 10, 2014)

In response to the new Egyptian military regime’s political repression, the Democratic Movement for National Liberation [DMNL] and other left groups of Egyptian civilians formed in Alexandria the United Revolutionary Front in February 1953; and in April 1953 a branch of the United Revolutionary Front was formed in Cairo, prior to the United Revolutionary Front renaming itself as Egypt’s National Democratic Front [NDF]. The following demands on Nasser’s military regime were then made by the National Democratic Front: 1. a return to constitutional rule in Egypt ; 2. a restoration of the civil liberties and democratic rights in Egypt ; 3. an end to military dictatorship in Egypt ; 4. the re-establishment of political and civil rights in Egypt ; and 5. the complete liberation of Egypt from the remaining special influence of UK colonialism on Egyptian society.
 
Egypt’s National Democratic Front also published the first issue of its newspaper al-Jabha (“The Front”) on June 12, 1953, in which it emphasized the following three political goals of the NDF:  1. to expel Anglo-American imperialism and all foreign UK occupation forces from all Egyptian territory; 2. to achieve political and economic democracy in Egypt ; and 3. to offer internationalist solidarity to oppressed and exploited people in other nations and, at the same time, work to prevent war and establish world peace. But in November 1953, around 40 members of Egypt ’s National Democratic Front were placed under arrest by Nasser ’s new military regime.
 
Although Nasser was the leader of the Free Officers military group and the real power behind the scenes following the July 1952 military coup in Egypt , until early 1954 the official chairman of the RCC and the new regime’s official president and prime minister was an Egyptian General named Naguib. But after Egyptian General Naguib openly criticized Nasser’s new regime for being too politically repressive, Naguib was pressured by Nasser and other RCC leaders to formally resign from his official posts as Egyptian president, prime minister and RCC chairman in February 1954.; and Nasser, himself, was officially proclaimed both prime minister of Egypt and RCC chairman of the post-July 1952 military regime.
 
Naguib, however, was temporarily reinstated—following street protests in support of Naguib and parliamentary democracy--as the official RCC chairman and official Egyptian prime minister on Mar. 8, 1954, after Nasser promised to convene a Constituent Assembly which would restore constitutional rule in Egypt . But when Nasser and the other RCC leaders decided on Mar. 29, 1954 not to hold a Constituent Assembly until January 1956, Naguib was pressured to permanently give up his official posts as RCC chairman and Egyptian Prime Minister to Nasser—following the suppression of pro-democracy student protests and the closing of Egyptian universities by Nasser’s military troops and police forces. And by Apr. 18, 1954, Nasser was now officially and publicly the most politically powerful leader in Egypt , even before he also eventually assumed, as well, the official position of Egyptian president in June 1956.
 
Despite the establishment of the State of Israel on Palestinian land in 1948 and the Egyptian military’s defeat in the 1948-49 Arab-Israeli War, the situation of Egyptians of Jewish religious background between late 1949 and 1954 had actually “slightly improved” and “Jewish emigration decreased,” according to the Encyclopedia Judaica. As Joel Beinin’s The Dispersion of Egyptian Jewry noted, “in the early 1950s” Egyptians of Jewish background “freely practiced professions with high public visibility—journalism, law, medicine and finance;” and “in 1951, the London Jewish Chronicle reported that there seemed to be no move toward mass emigration” to Israel .
 
After the July 23, 1952 military coup that overthrew Egypt ’s monarchical regime, “the new government was” also, initially, “favorably inclined toward Jews,” according to the Encyclopedia Judaica. But the same book also asserts that after Nasser replaced General Naguib as the official Egyptian prime minister and RCC chairman, “there was a change for the worse” in the situation of Egyptians of Jewish background who still chose to continue living in Egypt , even after the establishment of the State of Israel.

(end of part 16)

Friday, September 19, 2014

Lawrence, Massachusetts "Not Seasonally Adjusted" Jobless Rate: 11.9 Percent In July 2014

Eight major Massachusetts cities had “not seasonally adjusted” unemployment rates in July 2014 that exceeded the national “not seasonally adjusted” jobless rate for that month of 6.5 percent, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data:

1. The official “not seasonally adjusted” jobless rate in Lawrence, Massachusetts was 11.9 percent in July 2014;

2. The official “not seasonally adjusted” unemployment rate in Springfield, Massachusetts was 10.5 percent in July 2014;

3. The official “not seasonally adjusted” jobless rate in New Bedford, Massachusetts was 10.5 percent in July 2014;

4. The official “not seasonally adjusted” unemployment rate in Fall River, Massachusetts was 10.1 percent in July 2014;

5. The official “not seasonally adjusted” jobless rate in Brockton, Massachusetts was 8.6 percent in July 2014;

6. The official “not seasonally adjusted” unemployment rate in Worcester, Massachusetts was 8 percent in July 2014;

7. The official “not seasonally adjusted” jobless rate in Lynn, Massachusetts was 7.4 percent in July 2014; and

8. The official “not seasonally adjusted” unemployment rate in Lowell, Massachusetts was 7.4 percent in July 2014.

The official “not seasonally adjusted” unemployment rate in Boston, Massachusetts was also still 6.4 percent in July 2014.

In addition, in Massachusetts between July and August 2014, according to the Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development’s September 18, 2014 press release:

“,,,Preliminary estimates from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) show Massachusetts lost 5,300 jobs in August…The August total unemployment rate was up 0.2 of a percentage point to 5.8 percent from the July rate…BLS also revised its July job estimates to a 12,200 job gain from the 13,800 gain previously reported for the month…

“…Trade, Transportation and Utilities lost 10,600 (-1.9%) jobs over the month…Construction lost 700 (-0.6%) jobs over the month…Manufacturing lost 700 (-0.3%) over the month….

“The August 2014 estimates show…203,800 were unemployed…as 2,300 fewer residents were employed and 8,100 more residents were unemployed over the month…”


In July 2014, according to the “not seasonally adjusted” data, 217,300 workers in Massachusetts were still unemployed; and 59,478 of these unemployed workers lived in Boston, Brockton, Fall River, Lawrence, Lowell, Lynn, New Bedford, Springfield or Worcester..

Wednesday, September 17, 2014

The Movement To Democratize Egypt: A People's History of Egypt--Part 15: 1952-1953 Period

(The following article first appeared in The Rag Blog on February 3, 2014)

While not encouraging Nasser’s Free Officers military coup of July 23, 1952 which set up the Revolutionary Command Council [RCC], prior to the coup the anti-imperialist Democratic Movement for National Liberation [DMNL] secular left Egyptian activists had been supportive of the nationalist Free Officers military group who opposed UK imperialism. As Selma Botman’s Egypt from Independence to Revolution, 1919-1952 observed:
 
“The Free Officers…from 1950 depended on the DMNL to print their leaflets and address their envelopes, which contained Free Officer enclosures directed to military men outside both organizations. The Free Officers had their own publications which were printed secretly by the DMNL and either distributed by the Free Officers or posted by the mail. Because it was too dangerous for the Free Officers to write, print, and distribute their leaflets, they handed some of that responsibility to their communist allies.
 
“Nasser himself was the main actor of this scheme…”
 
Yet after the apparently CIA-supported July 23, 1952 military coup by Nasser’s Free Officers overthrew UK imperialism’s puppet regime and forced Egyptian King Farouk to go into exile on July 26, 1952, “the whole of DMNL’s printing department was arrested by Nasser, then a leader of the Revolutionary Command Council,” according to Egypt from Independence to Revolution, 1919-1952. As the same book also recalled, “this was Nasser’s abrupt way of saying that the…relationship between the Free Officers and the communists was over;” and “it demonstrated to the” Egyptian “left that the Free Officers’ organization was fearful of the communists.” So, not surprisingly, the DMNL then “announced that the Officers had ceded to the pressure of” U.S. “imperialism and were no longer allies.” And as Lloyd Gardner’s The Road To Tahir Square noted, “policy statements prepared by [Kermit] Roosevelt [of the CIA] for Nasser to deliver were often represented on Egyptian presidential letterhead with scarcely any changes…”
 
But even after 500 troops of Nasser’s RCC were ordered to suppress a strike by Egyptian workers at the Misr Fine Spinning and Weaving Company in Kafr al-Dawwwar on August 12, 1952--and the new RCC government subsequently hanged Egyptian labor leader Mustafa Khamees and a worker named Muhammad Abdel Rahman al-Baqri—the DMNL did not formally “break with the Free Officers until January 1953 when political parties were abolished” in Egypt by Nasser’s government, according to Egypt from Independence to Revolution, 1919-1952.
 
One reason the DMNL was reluctant to oppose Nasser’s 9-member Revolutionary Command Council until January 1953 was because on Sept. 9, 1952 an agrarian reform law in Egypt had been enacted by Nasser’s Free Officers military regime. As Egypt from Independence to Revolution, 1919-1952 noted:
 
“The law called for the limitation of ownership of up to 200 feddans of land with the provision that a family with 2 or more children could retain an additional 100 feddans. Every owner was to be indemnified in negotiable government bonds and the government was to be the sole distributor of expropriated land. The plan…succeeded in fragmenting the social, political, and economic power of the large landlords. The DMNL…applauded the program of land redistribution.”
 
Jason Thompson’s A History of Egypt observed, however, that “according to one estimate,” this agrarian reform law “affected only 10 percent of Egypt’s arable land and 200,000 peasants;” and “therefore benefited just a small portion of the landless rural population” in Egypt.
 
Then, “after the removal of the royal family, the expropriation of the landlords and pashas, the silencing of the political parties, and the show of force against the working-class” in Egypt, “it became clear that the RCC had decided to take hold of exclusive authority in the country,” according to Egypt from Independence to Revolution, 1919-1952.
 
On Jan. 16, 1953, for example, Nasser’s initially CIA-backed RCC regime dissolved all Egyptian political parties except the Muslim Brotherhood (which the regime later also banned in January 1954, after the Muslim Brotherhood organized anti-Nasser demonstrations and attacked pro-Nasser nationalist students at Cairo University) and created the RCC government’s own official “Liberation Party” political party on Jan. 23, 1953. Nasser’s RCC regime then arrested and imprisoned all Egyptian communist activists, suppressed anti-imperialist left opposition newspapers like al-Katib [“The Scribe”] and al-Muarasda [“The Opposition”] and harassed members of Egypt’s Peace Movement.

(end of part 15)

Monday, September 15, 2014

The Movement To Democratize Egypt: A People's History of Egypt--Part 14: 1949-1952 Period

(The following article originally appeared in The Rag Blog on January 27, 2014)

By the late 1940s, Egypt’s “playboy king,” Farouk, had become “notorious for womanizing—often with shocking flagrancy—and gambling, passing much of his time at night clubs,” according to Jason Thompson’s A History of Egypt. And despite the arrest of secular left Egyptian activists in the late 1940s, opposition to UK imperialism’s puppet monarchical regime of King Farouk developed among some politically nationalist and anti-imperialist Egyptian military officers, following the Egyptian military’s defeat in the 1948-49 Israeli-Arab War.
 
In addition, in 1950 “a wing of the Muslim Brotherhood” in Egypt even “called for collaboration with `communists’ against imperialism” since the 39,000 UK imperialist troops still occupying Egyptian soil in 1950 were three times the number of UK troops legally allowed in Egypt under the terms of the 1936 treaty between the UK and Egyptian governments, according to Selma Botman’s The Rise of Egyptian Communism, 1939-1970.
 
So, not surprisingly, by October 1951, the prime minister of the Egyptian monarchical regime, al-Nahhas, was pressured by anti-imperialist nationalist public opinion in Egypt to declare “null and void” the monarchical regime’s 1936 treaty with the UK government. And between October 1951 and January 1952, “applying the tactics of the united front," anti-establishment "left and right-wing political forces” in Egypt “engaged in the Battle of the Canal Zone,” according to The Rise of Egyptian Communism, 1939-1970. As the same book also recalled:
 
“The termination of the 1936 Treaty precipitated…concerted activity. Demonstrations raged in the larger cities. Guerrilla warfare broke out in the Suez Canal base [of the UK military]…80,000 Egyptian workers and office employees left their…British-affiliated jobs, thus paralyzing the workings of the Suez Canal base…Workers deserted British factories…Longshoremen refused to handle British supplies…”
 
And on Jan. 19, 1952, the UK military base at Tell-al-Kabir was attacked by anti-imperialist Egyptian commandos; and, in response 50 members of Egypt’s Bullaq Nizam auxiliary police force were massacred by UK imperialist troops. Then, according to The Rise of Egyptian Communism, 1939-1970, the following happened on Jan. 26, 1952 in Egypt:
 
“…A general strike closed all factories in the country. Students from the universities and al-Azhar marched on the center of Cairo and joined forces with workers gathering from the suburbs…The business district of Cairo, with its foreign-owned…businesses, was set afire.”
 
According to A History of Egypt:
 
“…Jan. 26, 1952 became known as Black Saturday…Some 400 hundred buildings were destroyed and 30 people lost their lives. Only after several hours…did the army restore order.”
 
In an attempt to prevent the Jan. 26, 1952 general strike in Egypt from developing quickly into a mass-based anti-imperialist revolutionary movement to overthrow Egypt’s monarchical regime and finally democratize Egyptian society, the regime’s prime minister then imposed martial law in Egypt again, suspended the Egyptian Constitution, arrested about 250 Egyptian political opponents of the regime and imposed censorship on all the mainstream Egyptian newspapers.
 
Yet between late January and July 1952, the objective conditions for an anti-imperialist political revolution in Egypt apparently continued to exist, since “the British soldiers were still in occupation of part of Egypt,” “rising prices were accompanied by increased unemployment” in Egyptian cities, “and the higher rents being imposed on Egyptian peasants by Egypt’s landowning elite” had increased the suffering in Egypt’s rural areas, according to The Rise of Egyptian Communism, 1939-1970.
 
So although the secular left Democratic Movement for National Liberation [DMNL] opponents of the regime in Egypt did not encourage the secret dissident Free Officers military group of Egyptian nationalist opponents of UK Imperialism--that Gamal Abdel Nasser led--to overthrow the monarchical regime, on July 23, 1952 the Free Officers group seized power from King Farouk’s regime in a bloodless military coup—with the apparent approval of the CIA--and created a Revolutionary Command Council [RCC] in Egypt; and “on July 26 [1952], Farouk sailed from Alexandria aboard the royal yacht al-Mahrussa into an inglorious exile that ended with his death in a Rome nightclub 13 years later,” according to A History of Egypt.
 
According to Rutgers University Professor of History Lloyd Gardner’s The Road To Tahir Square book, “there is some evidence that” the coup by Nasser’s Free Officers group “had CIA involvement—or at least a friendly nod.” As the same book also noted:
 
“A few hours after the takeover, one of the plotters met with a U.S. military attache’ to assure him of the revolutionary council’s pro-Western sentiments and to ask for his help in persuading the British not to intervene…There remains considerable mystery about what, if any, role the CIA played in Farouk’s overthrow. Because Kermit `Kim’ Roosevelt Jr….who had played a key role in returning the Shah of Iran to his throne, had been assigned to arrange a liaison with the Egyptian colonels, there were stories about the `company’s’ role even at the beginning. And there were many boasts about `my boys,’ as [then-U.S. Ambassador to Egypt Jefferson] Caffery supposedly referred to the new regime…”
 
But according to The Rise of Egyptian Communism, 1939-1970, “the DMNL was given advanced knowledge of the military coup d’etat through Ahmad Hamraash, leader of the DMNL’s military branch, who was summoned to Cairo from Alexandria by Nasser” the day before the coup and was “briefed” by Nasser “on the events to take place;” and since “two prominent Free Officers, Aid dl-Halim Ami and Yusuf Siddiq, were sympathetic to the idea of the Left,” after the coup took place, “the DMNL initially supported the Free Officers’ coup.”

(end of part 14)

Saturday, September 13, 2014

The Movement To Democratize Egypt: A People's History of Egypt--Part 13: 1948-1949 Period

(The following article was originally posted on The Rag Blog on January 20, 2014)

Despite the Egyptian monarchical regime’s previous business links with some pro-Zionist Egyptian businesspeople, in 1948 it joined other Arab governments in attempting to block the eviction of Palestinian Arabs from Palestine and the establishment of a Zionist state in Palestine by militarily opposing the Zionist movement’s military forces. And when the State of Israel was established on May 15, 1948, an emergency law was decreed by the Egyptian government that prohibited many Egyptians of Jewish religious background from leaving Egypt without a special permit. In addition, “hundreds of Jews were arrested and many had their property confiscated” in Egypt during the first Arab-Israeli War of the late 1940s, according to the Encyclopedia Judaica.
 
Yet the Egyptian monarchical regime of King Farouk also apparently had other, more self-serving, motives for militarily confronting the Zionist movement’s military forces in the late 1940s Arab-Israeli War than just defending the national rights of Palestinian Arabs. As Selma Botman’s The Rise of Egyptian Communism, 1939-1970 observed:
 
“King Farouk used the war as a means of restoring himself to the role of national leader. His intent…was to direct popular feeling away from local problems and toward the conflict abroad…In Egypt, the war also meant the imposition of martial law, the resumption of anti-democratic measures, and the opening of concentration camps. It thereby provided the Palace with a choice opportunity to strike the leftists who were accused of national treason for their stand on Palestine .
 
“When martial law was proclaimed [in Egypt] on May 15, 1948 a brutal wave of internment of the revolutionary left began…The widespread arrests struck at the core of the movement…”
 
But the imposition of martial law in Egypt did not enable the Egyptian military to militarily defeat the Zionist movement’s military units that consisted of “more fighters with better arms,” according to Jason Thompson’s A History of Egypt. And as the same book also recalled:
 
“… Egypt was not ready for the war. Farouk was a troublesome, interfering grand strategist; equipment was inferior or missing, support always inadequate… Egypt signed the armistice in early 1949…Hundreds of thousands of Palestinian refugees poured into Gaza , where Egypt assumed administrative control. Egyptian losses in the war were 2,000 dead and many more wounded and missing…Rumors circulated that members of the royal court and high-ranking officers had colluded to supply the military with inferior equipment for personal profit…”
 
Although there had been only limited support for the Zionist movement and its goal of establishing a Jewish state in Palestine among Egyptians of Jewish religious background prior to 1948, following the 1948-49 Arab-Israeli War around 25,000 Egyptians of Jewish religious background ended up emigrating from Egypt between 1948 and 1950.  According to Gilles Perrault’s 1987 book, A Man Apart: The Life of Henri Curiel:
 
“The first victims of the creation of Israel were the Palestinians hounded out of their country; a second, the Oriental Jews condemned, for the foreseeable future, to a new exodus. Zionist secret services, aware of a lack of enthusiasm on the part of Cairo and Baghdad Jews to move to Israel , undertook to speed up the process by instigating a campaign of bomb attacks designed to convince the more reticent of the impossibility of staying in an Arab country. Their co-religionists, little suspecting such Machiavellianism, attributed the explosions to Muslim fanaticism until the day when the secret leaked out, causing a serious political scandal in Israel .”
 
History of Egypt also asserts that “the Zionists also staged attacks on Egyptian Jews to frighten them into leaving Egypt for Israel , with unfortunate success.”
 
Yet according to Joel Beinin’s The Dispersion of Egyptian Jewry, the bombing attacks in Cairo during the first Arab-Israeli War between June and November 1948 (unlike the bombings in Baghdad)  were apparently the work of Egypt’s right-wing Society of Muslim Brothers and “in a 1950 trial” in Egypt, “members of the Society were charged” by the Egyptian monarchical government “with carrying out all the bombings against the Jews of Cairo from June to November 1948;” and “the prosecution argued that the bombings were part of a strategy to exploit the issue of Palestine to destabilize and undermine the” UK imperialist-backed “regime” by the right-wing Islamic fundamentalist leaders.
 
In apparent response to the Zionist movement’s eviction of Palestinian Arabs from their homeland and establishment of the State of Israel on May 15, 1948, a bomb had apparently been planted in the Karaiate Jewish quarter of Cairo that exploded on June 20, 1948--killing 22 Egyptians of Jewish background and wounding 41 other Egyptians of Jewish background. Then, in an apparent response to a July 15, 1948 bombing by Israeli planes of “a residential neighborhood near the Qubba Palace in Cairo” that killed “many civilians and destroyed many homes” and provoked “an angry march on the Jewish quarter” of Cairo, “an explosion in the Rabbinite Jewish Quarter in Cairo killed 19 and wounded 62 victims” on Sept. 22, 1948, according to The Dispersion of Egyptian Jewry.

(end of part 13)

Thursday, September 11, 2014

The Movement To Democratize Egypt: A People's History of Egypt--Part 12: 1947-1948 Period--section 2

(The following article originally appeared on The Rag Blog on January 6, 2014)

Prior to the Zionist movement’s establishment of the State of Israel on Palestinian land in 1948 and subsequent eviction of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian Arabs from Palestine during the late 1940s, between 65,000 and 80,000 Egyptians of Jewish religious background by then lived in Egypt. Around 64 percent of Egyptians of Jewish religious background lived in Cairo and around 32 percent of Egyptians of Jewish background lived in Alexandria in 1947, according to the Egyptian census of 1947. And prior to the establishment of the State of Israel, Egyptians of Jewish background “attained an inordinately high number of respectable positions in finance, commerce, industry and the professions” in post-World War II Egyptian society, according to Selma Botman’s The Rise of Egyptian Communism, 1939-1970. As the Encyclopedia Judaica also, for example, recalled:
 
“In 1947 most Egyptian Jews (59%) were merchants, and the rest were employed in industry (18%), administration, and public services (11%). The economic situation of Egyptian Jewry was relatively good; there were several multi-millionaires, a phenomenon unusual in other Jewish communities of the Middle East …There were no restrictions on accepting Jews in government or foreign schools.”
 
And in addition to the relatively prosperous Egyptians of Jewish religious background who lived in Cairo prior to the establishment of the State of Israel in Palestine, there were also “many poor Jews living in the Haret al-Ya Hud section of Cairo who were completely indistinguishable from their Muslim counterparts” in Egypt; and “with the exception of their adherence to religious belief, they ate, spoke, dressed, and lived in virtually identical ways” as the Egyptians of Islamic religious background, according to The Rise of Egyptian Communism, 1939-1970.
 
So, not surprisingly, although only about 20 percent of the people of Jewish religious background who lived in Egypt were officially considered Egyptian citizens in 1947, “Zionism was generally an alien ideology to most Egyptian Jews,” prior to 1947, according to The Rise of Egyptian Communism, 1939-1970; and the Jewish League to Combat Zionism [al-Rabita al-Tsrailiyya li Muk afahat al-Sahyuniyya] was founded in the mid-1940s by an Egyptian named Marcel Israel which included Egyptian “leftists and communists alike,” according to the same book.
 
Egypt’s mid-1940s Jewish League to Combat Zionism had the following four objectives, according to The Rise of Egyptian Communism, 1939-1970: 1. “working against Zionism;” 2. “strengthening ties between Egyptian Jews and the Egyptian people in the struggle for independence;” 3. “lessen the gap between Jews and Arabs in Palestine ;” and 4. “solving the problem of the Wandering Jew.” But since the Egyptian monarchical regime’s prime minister in 1947, al-Nuqrashi , apparently was being backed by some Egyptian businessmen of Jewish background who were sympathetic to the Zionist movement (and also wished to discourage Egyptians of Islamic and Jewish religious backgrounds from uniting in opposition to UK imperialist special influence in Egypt), al-Nuqrashi suppressed the Jewish League to Combat Zionism in 1947.
 
Yet when the United Nations voted to partition Palestine --despite the objections of most people then living in Palestine and other Arab counties and many rank-and-file members of Egypt ’s Democratic Movement for National Liberation [DMNL]—the leftist DMNL group’s leadership—like the Soviet Union —endorsed the partition plan. But in its al-Jamahir party newspaper, the DMNL also clarified its late 1947 unpopular political stance on the issue of Palestine ’s partition in the following way:
 
“We do not want to take Palestine away from the Arabs and give it to the Jews but we want to take it away from imperialism and give it to the Arabs and Jews…Then will begin the long struggle for rapprochement between Arab and Jewish states…”

(end of part 12, section 2)

Tuesday, September 9, 2014

The Movement To Democratize Egypt: A People's History of Egypt--Part 12: 1947-1948 Period-section1

(The following article was originally posted on The Rag Blog on December 11, 2013)

Despite the post-July 1946 political repression of Egyptian dissidents by the UK imperialist-backed monarchical regime, by the end of May 1947 a new Egyptian left anti-imperialist organization, the Democratic Movement for National Liberation [DMNL] a/ka Hadeto was formed, after EMNL and Iskra leaders united and merged their approximately 1,200 Egyptian communist supporters into one group.
 
Solely funded in 1947 “from subscriptions and contributions imposed upon party members,” the DMNL “had some success” recruiting more Egyptian supporters in “the textile workers’ union, the transportation union, among…communication workers, hotel workers, tobacco workers, and military men” who often met fellow Egyptian left activists downtown at the CafĂ© Issayi-vitch in Cairo, according to Selma Botman’s The Rise of Egyptian Communism, 1939-1970. So, not surprisingly, after the owners of the Misr Spinning and Weaving Company factory in Mahalla-al-Kubra-- Egypt ’s largest and most modern textile factory—announced plans to replace over 12,000 Egyptian textile factory workers with new machinery, the textile workers went on strike in early September 1947. And after 4 of the striking workers were then killed and 70 strikers were arrested by the Egyptian forces of “law and order,” 17,000 more Egyptian textile “workers in Shubra went on strike for 1 day in sympathy,” according to the same book.
 
The early September 1947 strike in Mahalla-al-Kubra was lost by the textile workers following its repression by the Egyptian monarchical regime. But during the last three months of 1947, additional strikes by textile factory workers in Alexandria , by oil workers in Suez and by Egyptian teachers and telegraph workers broke out; and between 1948 and 1950 Egyptian nurses, police officers, gas workers and textile workers in some other Egyptian cities also held strikes.
 
Although the anti-imperialist left-wing DMNL was still an underground group that had to organize clandestinely during the late 1940s because of the repressive nature of the Egyptian monarchical regime, besides recruiting Egyptian workers who apparently acted as catalysts for the late 1940s  wave of labor strikes in Egypt, the anti-imperialist DMNL also was able to recruit into its ranks during the 1940s some non-commissioned officers in the Egyptian military and some Egyptian peasants or fallahin. And by the early 1950s, “the DMNL had contacts in tens of villages” in Egypt , according to The Rise of Egyptian Communism, 1939-1970. In addition, by the early 1950s, there were almost 500 unions in Egypt , according to an article by Atef Said, titled “ Egypt ’s Long Labor History.” that appeared in Against The Current in 2009.
 
During the late 1940s, around 13 million Egyptians lived in Egypt ’s countryside in the Nile River valley and 6 million Egyptians lived in Egyptian cities. So although the number of Egyptian factory workers had increased from 247,000 to 756,000 between 1937 and 1947, around 66 percent of Egypt ’s labor force was still engaged in agricultural work in the late 1940s. And despite Egypt ’s formal political independence, foreign business investors still owned 61 percent of all Egyptian companies in 1947.
 
Yet the various anti-imperialist left secular Egyptian political groups together still had much less mass support by the 1940s than did the religiously fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood group. As Selma Botman’s Egypt from Independence to Revolution, 1919-1952 observed:
 
“[Hasan] al-Banna…established the Muslim Brotherhood in 1928…Al-Banna promoted a simple and absolute message to his followers: struggle to rid Egypt of foreign occupation; defend and obey Islam…By the outbreak of World War II, the Brotherhood…movement’s strength was…estimated at somewhere from many hundreds of thousands to beyond a million activists…”
 
But according to Robert Dreyfuss’ Devil’s Game: How The United States Helped Unleash Fundamentalist Islam, “Banna’s Muslim Brotherhood was established with a grant from England ’s Suez Canal Company, and over the next quarter century British diplomats, the intelligence service, MI6, and Cairo ’s Anglophilic King Farouk would use the Muslim Brotherhood as a cudgel against Egypt ’s communists and nationalists…”
 
So, not, surprisingly, after World War II, Al-Banna’s Muslim Brotherhood apparently began to temporarily collaborate with the Egyptian monarchical regime in attempting to block an increase of mass support for Egypt ’s anti-imperialist secular left for a few years. As the same book recalled, “between 1945 and 1948…the organization…acted on the instructions of various ruling governments, as a counterweight to the Communists” in Egypt; and the Muslim “Brotherhood would sabotage meetings, precipitate clashes at public gatherings and even damage property” of the anti-imperialist secular left opposition groups with which the Muslim Brotherhood competed politically for recruits and which the Egyptian monarchical government had forced underground.
 
However, after the Egyptian monarchical government’s prime minister, al-Nuqrashi, began to feel the Muslim Brotherhood now represented a political threat to the regime and “used his martial law authority to dissolve” the Muslim Brotherhood “in November 1948,” al-Nuqrashi was assassinated a month later by a student attached to the Brotherhood;” and, utilizing King Farouk’s bodyguards, the Egyptian government “responded by murdering Hasan al-Banna,” the Muslim Brotherhood’s founder and leader, in 1949, according to Jason Thompson’s A History of Egypt

(end of part 12-section1)